> The distance_to() method is a pretty standard "great circle" calculation, > and that's exactly its purpose. Are you sure your "faster" version does > the same? Does it yield the same (numeric) results? And besides, in the > visual range direct_distance_to() should be good enough, and it's > certainly > faster. I doubt that considering Earth curvature is *that* important for > cloud distances.
See http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=9495 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
