Tim Moore wrote:
> I for one really enjoyed the list and plan to check out some of the more
> highly rated ones with which I'm not familiar. I can't believe that the
> ratings will come as a surprise to any aircraft developer, and I hope that
> their egos aren't so fragile as to be discouraged by a low rating!
My own ego is not affected in any way, last but not least because I
didn't model any of these aircraft. But I do know some of the
respective real-life counterparts (mostly single engined aircraft)
pretty well because I'm flying these as PIC or at least as co-pilot and
for almost all of them I'd end up with a different rating.
This is the rather simple background to my 'complaint'.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
