On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote: > On Sunday, December 12, 2010 11:59:30 am Stuart Buchanan wrote: >> > I also like having a minimum for each individual rating category so that >> > everything has to have had approx. the same level of work to move up the >> > status scale. >> >> I could extend the minimum values downwards so that an "alpha" aircraft >> needs a minimum score of 1 in each category. Is that what you meant? > > No. I was mostly thinking that for the higher status levels that each > category needed to meet some floor value. Alpha status is so low that I don't > think a per category floor is very useful.
OK. I thought I'd done that already by stating the a production status aircraft must have a minimum of 4 in each category? Or, do you mean that a production aircraft must have minimum value 4 in every category, but a 5 in (say) systems ? I think I'd prefer to shift the score definitions instead, so that a score of 4 in a given category reflects what we consider "production level". Does that make sense? -Stuart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
