On Thursday 10 February 2011 06:09:56 Geoff McLane wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 19:51 +0000, Martin Spott wrote:
> > I have seen this on various asphalt runways as well...
>
> Well, I just experimented by editing apt.dat.gz, and
> inverted the 'surface' numbers - made the 4204 ft
> runway 15x a 4, and the short 08x 1902 a 5, and no more
> tilting ;=)) so far...
>
> One might argue that 'Gravel' (5) should be 'harder'
> than 'Dirt' (4) in the 810 spec, and that 'Turf/grass'
> (3) should be softer than than either Gravel or Dirt,
> but perhaps that is a question for Robin Peel.
>
> Anyway, this fixed it so I can watch for those pesky
> kangaroos hopping around ;=))
>
> Regards,
>
> Geoff.

As far as I know, JSBSim still doesn't know about surfaces?

Ron

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to