On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 12:57 +0000, AJ MacLeod wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:43:43 +0000
> Alasdair <ali...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> 
> > On an OT philisophical note.. 
> > Is , or rather, was the introduction of NASAL scripting a "Good Thing"
> > or can it be considered as the hugest abomination to ever befall the FG
> > World
> 
> I really can't see how anyone with any experience whatsoever in developing 
> models for FlightGear could fail to agree that the property tree coupled with 
> nasal is an utterly invaluable and incredibly powerful, yet flexible and 
> simple to learn tool that opens up an entire world of possibilities that just 
> wouldn't be feasible otherwise.
> 
> "Hugest abomination"... sorry, but I'd have to question the sanity or level 
> of FG knowledge of anyone who would suggest that with any kind of sincerity...
> 
> AJ
> 
That's just about the reponse I was expecting. Thanks, it was just that
that nasal sometimes gets right up my nose. Sorry for the noise, back to
musing.

-- 
Kind regards,

Alasdair


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to