Hi,
> Hi, > Perhaps some of you have noticed, > that some of the aircraft that > come with the standard flightgear package should be > changed. > > A few examples, we could have a more realistic commercial > jet than the > 777-200(the FDM is terribly unrealistic), we could have a > better > modeled helicopter than the BO-105, and a better ultralight > than the > dragonfly. > The 777-200 has now an own repository on gitorious.org, and I see a lot of improvements. Currently it is the Airliner with the most sophisticated AP and other systems like Autobrakes etc... The Bo105 is the heli with the most realistic fdm we have. It is based on detailed real datas from a NASA-report and behaves like the real one. The Bell UH1 is realistic as well, and makes use of the same NASA report, but has some problems with Autorotation. Btw. is the Bo105 easy to fly and recommended for beginners. That's why I still vote for the Bo105. The Ec135 has some problems with fps-perfomance and I'm currently working on fix this issues. The Ec130 needs a good documentation for the beginners as the startup is not for beginners, and this needs some time to write. Heiko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
