On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Jon S. Berndt <jonsber...@comcast.net> wrote: > "Staying beneath the radar" might be effective but do you feel good about it? > Is it the ethical thing to do? Unethical? Hoping that ignorance is bliss? > Trying to ignore a perceived problem and wishing it would go away because it > is too hard to do things the "right" way? > > OTOH even if a company feels that a violation is taking place they would > surely make a friendly request first. > > Jon
I don't want to be misunderstood: I applaud Heiko's sentiment. But in this case, yes, I would feel good about it, and yes, I believe it's a reasonably ethical position for a loose collection of people who make non-commercial virtual aircraft and who are totally willing to comply with legal requests. -Gary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
