On Feb 27, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Oliver Fels wrote: > Vivian Meazza wrote: >> Exactly the answer to be expected. Note the "association" concept. >> Shouldn't have asked. > > In the same sense as FlightProSim did not ask to use the IP of others and > violate their license? > > Oliver >
No, not in your twisted logic. FG is not creating income based upon others work. FG is representing the environment and aircraft created in a realistic manner. A proper analogy would be for FPS to sell the "associated" livery for a profit. Which if you hadn't brought this up would have been the case. …not a bad idea. Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
