thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> Since I don't follow the 'rule' by coding 10.000+ lines in Nasal, I
> suppose that is partially thrown into my direction. From where I stand,
> there are good reasons to use Nasal - first of all the userbase which
> regularly compiles their own code is small, whereas people do install
> addon packages - so I get a lot more feedback and test results. Second
> that one usually can't really crash the whole system from Nasal. Third,
> it's very easy to quickly try something and very maintenance-friendly.
> Fourth, you can actually start developing something without knowing how
> the core code ties together - which I suppose takes a lot of time to
> learn. And so on.
Replace "coding 10.000+ lines in Nasal" by "inventing a custom set of
traffic laws". The justification would match almost in the same way,
but nevertheless it's obstructive in both cases ....
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
