On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:18:36 +0200 HB-GRAL <flightg...@sablonier.ch> wrote:
> Hi Core (and the rest of the entire organism of course) > Why not splitting up the Aircraft folder into hangars as collection of > aircrafts as plug-ins, collection of big teams or small but heavy > industries ? IMHO that adds another not very logical layer of complication for little gain. There's a nice "democratic" aspect to every aircraft being in a single central repository, and reduced opportunities for those "clique" type groups that so naturally spring up and are divisive and very offputting to new contributers coming to the project. Up until now it's been very straightforward to get a new model included - if it's your own work and under a suitable licence you simply ask someone with commit rights if you know one, or offer it to the dev list and it goes in. There's no embarrasment over which hangar / group / clique to submit it to, and I think that's a very good thing. Cheers, AJ -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
