On Monday, November 28, 2011 18:31:42 Eric van den Berg wrote:
> For GA  (what I have handy right now):
> The good old Garmin 400 series: VOR/LOC:-103.5dBm, GS:-87dBm
> Avidyne (EntegraII): VOR: 5uV, LOC and GS: 10uV
> 
> www.repeater-builder.com/measuring-*sensitivity*/*dbm*2uv.pdf
> /for conversion table!/
> 
> The Avidyne is TSO minimums if I remember correctly. Their units tend to
> depend on GPS (and thus do not care much for radio navigation).
> 
> Airline stuff goes down to like 0.5uV (so much more sensitive and
> expensive). They can receive a VOR signal at FL300 at quasi-optical range!
> 

Thanks, that is useful data! From what I could gather from different sources 
on the internet, typical VOR ground equipment operates with around 100-200 W 
ERP, am I correct?


> Antenna cable losses have to be added for in airplane performance (and
> they are usually significant).

I will make the antenna gain configurable for each station/aircraft, so any 
cable losses can be added into the system that way. I think that losses might 
not be very high in the VHF airband unless the aircraft uses very crappy coax 
or a significant length, but that might change for GS frequencies in the 300 
MHz range, of course.

Cheers,
Adrian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to