Erik Hofman wrote:
> This is hopefully also a good encouragement for the PAF team to keep
> developing their version and keep it available in their own hangar.
> There's nothing wrong with two different version of the same aircraft
> floating around. It's not really custom to FlightGear but almost common
> practice for other simulators.
If the authors can´t sort it out themselves, why not each have their own
version of the aircraft within FG. This is not without precedent.
I don´t think that consigning improved aircraft to a 3rd party hangar is
good for the FG project as a whole.
As FG is GPL there is no reason why each cannot draw code from the other.
Please move the bickering to a private forum. The points have been made
(many times) and it is clear that neither party gets on well with the other.
Alan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
