> Ok I haven't entirely given up on the idea of removing the > auto-coordination from the code.
Why? > Wouldn't it be more appropriate to add > that rudder control to controls.nas? Nasal runs per graphical frame, FDMs may need to run faster at low framerates. Nasal AP systems tend to become unstable below 15 fps or so (see the F-14b). > Then it can be replaced if need be on a per aircraft basis , but not > break anything otherwise. You can replace it now on a per aircraft basis at the simple expense of setting a single property to false. If the aircraft is equipped with a better system, then that system can do so. Why is that a problem? > And maybe it could be slip/skid-ball driven ... my whole > point is NOT to disable it but make it configurable. Yes, them make it configurable on any aircraft you like. But it should not be absent from any aircraft you haven't touched. Cheers, * Thorsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
