Gene Buckle wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Michael Sgier wrote: > >> Traffic and parking etc. are handled via xml files in Flightgear different >> to X-Plane. >> But to make changes to the opensource apt.dat forward them to Robin: >> http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showtopic=58356 >> > Right, but if you use the v10 format, all that data is there and you don't > have to hand-craft an xml file for every airport in the database. It's > silly not to leverage an already existing resource, especially when it can > save a ton of work.
Gene, as you know, FlightGear's XML structure for taxiway routing and other scenery-related airport info predates the capabilities of the v10 X-Plane apt.dat format by _many_ years. All the work's already been done, therefore, even if it might be worthwhile to consider merging FlightGear's data stock into Robin's file, your claim sounds a bit inappropriate. And there's still one thing to consider: Having one central set of apt./nav.dat files in the Base Package still doesn't address the trend of the FlightGear project and Scenery development proceeding asynchronously. Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel