On 5 Sep 2012, at 09:06, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > On a practical note I'd also point out that some FG development has > been paid for through the commercial use of FG. In the past I've been > paid to develop simulations for my local museum of flight, the results > of which have been fed back into FG.
+1 > Changing the license won't actually make any difference to FPS et al. > They appear still to be selling v1.9.1, and given their advertising > methods, I can see no reason why they would put any effort into > updating their package. +1 > > As this comes up on a monthly basis, perhaps we need an FAQ explaining > why changing the license is a bad idea, has no support from the core > developers, isn't practical, and won't make any difference anyway? +1 :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
