On 02/27/2013 12:17 PM, BARANGER Emmanuel wrote: > Le 27/02/2013 11:45, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a > écrit : >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 15 >> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:42:19 +0000 >> From: Renk Thorsten<thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi> >> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] FG vs. FSX demo >> To: FlightGear developers discussions >> <flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> Message-ID:<e495a106ff5f31448739e79d34138c192789b...@mbs2.ad.jyu.fi> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> >> 4) FDMs >> >> * I've tried the ultralight, the twin-prop Baron and the Learjet. As far as >> I could tell, they handled just the same, the only difference i noticed was >> the airspeed I could get out of them. It's just no comparison at all to our >> JSBSim beauties like the SenecaII or the P-51D where the FDM feels even the >> torque from spinning up the engine. The FSX experience reminded me of badly >> tuned YaSIm models - it sort of gets the rough characteristics right, but >> that's about all. > How can you say such nonsense without anyone to react ? > > Obviously compare the worst YASim with the best JSBSim will always be > beneficial for JSBSim. But the opposite will be benefit YASim. This is > ridiculous.
This was not a comparison between YASim and JSBSim, we all know both have their strengths and weaknesses. It was a comparison between a badly tuned YASim model and normal FSX behaviour. So even there YASim beats FSX when the YASim models is properly tuned. Erik -- http://www.adalin.com - Hardware accelerated AeonWave and OpenAL for Windows and Linux ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
