David,

> Now, how should the glidescope behave on the backcourse?  Right now,
> it gives a glidepath that's just a little high (because the GS
> transmitter is too far down the runway).  That's probably wrong.
> Can anyone tell me what the GS *should* do on a BC approach?

If I remember correctly the only thing that you might read
in that case is some indication of the reflection of the GS. 
Since the beam is directed upwards (at 3 deg) in theory
it should be readable 'behind' the emitter on the backcourse.
So defaulting back to not reading a GS at all should be
o.k. for the indicator ... my .02

> As soon as I've managed to accumulate the required 50 hours PIC
> cross-country I'm going to start work on my instrument rating -- what
> better use to make of a Canadian winter?  Until then, I'll have to
> rely on advice from others with real-world IFR experience.

I've done some hood-time in Ottawa last year but I moved
before finishing my IFR ticket :)

Regards
Nils

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users

Reply via email to