Paul Surgeon wrote:
> Sent: 16 October 2004 13:11 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Flightgear-users] "Flyable" aircraft > > Does someone have a list of "flyable" aircraft for FlightGear? > About the only aircraft that handles in a realistic way is the 172. > > What I would love to see done is all the incomplete aircraft stripped out > of > FlightGear. It leaves a sour taste in one's mouth when you try all the > aircraft and just get one mess after another. > It would be better if there was only 1 good aircraft in FlightGear than > add a > whole bunch of useless ones that just drag the reputation and quality of > FlightGear down. > How did most of these aircraft make it into official releases anyway? > > I know these are some rather hard remarks but I can't find one decent jet > to > fly in FlightGear and it's frustrating. > Is there something wrong with the Hunter or Seahawk? The Spitfire also works. Regards Vivian _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
