Andreas wrote:
> Sent: 16 October 2004 14:22 > To: FlightGear user discussions > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] "Flyable" aircraft > > Paul Surgeon wrote: > > Does someone have a list of "flyable" aircraft for FlightGear? > > About the only aircraft that handles in a realistic way is the 172. > > I once tried to come up with a table listing what worked and what didn't > work on all aircrafts, but gave up. > > > What I would love to see done is all the incomplete aircraft stripped > out of > > FlightGear. It leaves a sour taste in one's mouth when you try all the > > aircraft and just get one mess after another. > > Me too, but in another way. There is a --verbose flag to --help, right? > Give this flag to --show-aircraft as well so that, by default, > --show-aircraft only shows the working airplaines, and only with > --verbose would the more experimental ones show. > > > It would be better if there was only 1 good aircraft in FlightGear than > add a > > whole bunch of useless ones that just drag the reputation and quality of > > FlightGear down. > > How did most of these aircraft make it into official releases anyway? > > > > I know these are some rather hard remarks but I can't find one decent > jet to > > fly in FlightGear and it's frustrating. > > I'm also stuck with c172 for now, and short trips. > Very useful it was too: I fixed all the things that I could in my models. Why give up? Regards, Vivian _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
