Josh Babcock > Vivian Meazza wrote: > > Dave Culp > > > > > > > >>>Umm ... > >>> > >>> $ grep -1 scenario $FG_ROOT/Aircraft/T38/T38-set.xml > >>> <ai> > >>> <scenario>refueling_demo</scenario> > >>> </ai> > >>> > >>>* Dave Culp -- Monday 20 June 2005 23:10: > >>> > >>>>You can only run one AI scenario at a time. > >> > >>Correct, the scenario defined in an aircraft's *.set file overrides the > >>scenario set in the preferences.xml file. In this case the T-38 is set > up > >>as > >>a demonstrator of the airborne radar, so a target (the tanker) is set up > >>in > >>an orbit over KSFO. > >> > > > > > > Now we know. It's a good idea, and of course why would anyone want to > play > > with the T38 and a carrier? A note in the T38 description would perhaps > be > > nice. > > > > Vivian > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flightgear-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d > > > > What might be even nicer is to have two versions of the t-38, one with > the ai scenario and one without. It should only take a few lines of xml > to do it. And as always, I will voice my oppinion that aircrft files > should never override configuration settings unless they absoloutely > have to. > > OK, here it is: > http://jrbabcock.home.comcast.net/flightgear/t38/T38.tgz >
I agree: we shouldn't fiddle unnecessarily with a user's settings. If an aircraft file does so for good reason, then this should be readily apparent to the user. V. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
