Dave Culp wrote:

> FlightGear is *full* of presets that I don't care for at all, and I went 
> through the learning process that everyone has to go through, wherein you 
> learn how the preferences are read and in what order, and how to configure 
> each run the way you want to.  Maybe the folks running FG from the UI get a 
> different concept of what FG is than those who don't?
> 
> 
> Dave
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
> 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
> 
No, I think that the configuration has just plain gotten more
complicated than it has to be. Not that there are more options than
there should be, just that configurations are getting hidden away in odd
places. fg is so powerful that it is easy to abuse. We should probably
be asking "should I do this" a lot more than "can I do this". Whenever
someone puts something in a file, they should be asking "is this the
right place to put this, does it make sense, what will it prevent?".

Anyway, can someone grab those three files and commit them?  They are
very simple changes and make two T-38s, one with the radar demo
activated and one without:

tower:chords$ fgfs --show-aircraft

Available aircraft:
<snip>
   T38                          Northrop T-38
   T38-radar                    Northrop T-38 refueling demo
<snip>

Josh

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to