Dave Culp wrote: > FlightGear is *full* of presets that I don't care for at all, and I went > through the learning process that everyone has to go through, wherein you > learn how the preferences are read and in what order, and how to configure > each run the way you want to. Maybe the folks running FG from the UI get a > different concept of what FG is than those who don't? > > > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d > No, I think that the configuration has just plain gotten more complicated than it has to be. Not that there are more options than there should be, just that configurations are getting hidden away in odd places. fg is so powerful that it is easy to abuse. We should probably be asking "should I do this" a lot more than "can I do this". Whenever someone puts something in a file, they should be asking "is this the right place to put this, does it make sense, what will it prevent?".
Anyway, can someone grab those three files and commit them? They are very simple changes and make two T-38s, one with the radar demo activated and one without: tower:chords$ fgfs --show-aircraft Available aircraft: <snip> T38 Northrop T-38 T38-radar Northrop T-38 refueling demo <snip> Josh _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
