On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:51:07 +0100, Gerard wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 07:38 -0800, Andy Ross a écrit : > > Shelton D'Cruz wrote: > > > As I make my way down the list of so called "Flyable" planes, > > > the only real contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - > > > really how many Cessna's do we really need?? and the rest - > > > well they are too incomplete to fly!! > > > > The B1900 is a Beechcraft, not a Cessna, and a twin engine commuter > > turboprop. Even interpreting "cessna" as a single engine light > > aircraft, the 1900 ain't. > > > > And I'm on record that the most fun, most instructive time I've > > had with FlightGear is practicing STOL techniques with the > > Harrier -- an aircraft with no 3D model nor cockpit. I guess I > > wasn't flying then. Thanks for setting me straight. > > > > Help or go home, basically. If you want eye candy and polish > > over fixability and variety, stay with MSFS. > > > > Andy > > > Hi Andy, > > I never told you precisely, so i do. > Your work about Harrier was useful for me, > in a private use i have converted a high detailed msfs model harrier > GR7 > so i do use your fdm. > > This an exemple where every a/c work is useful and must be delivered > officially (not stored in a CVS tree only). .._only_ under each works own license. My understanding is Microsoft's litigation policy and our GPL and our financial resources are not all that compatible. ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
