Hi Syd No I don't think the aircraft are "crap"
Regards Shelton. > Shelton D'Cruz wrote: > >As I make my way down the list of so called "Flyable" planes, the only > > real contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - really how many > > Cessna's do we really need?? and the rest - well they are too incomplete > > to fly!! > > > >Quite disappointing in fact. > >You can forget about flying these: > > > >737 Boeing 737 > >747 Boeing 747-400 (YASim) > >747-100 Boeing 747-100 (JSBSim) > >A320 > > > >The others are mostly incomplete - anyone else find this as well? > > > >And pity the Citation - which is possessed. > > > > > >Regards > >Shelton. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Flightgear-users mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > >2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d > > well I have to put my 2 cents worth in .If you think the aircraft are > crap ... how about helping out by giving us some of that aircraft > knowledge you apparently have that we dont .That would be much more useful. > Personally I like them all ,(Santa is great!) but for my own , finding > the information for these aircraft isn't always easy.Maybe you could > point out specific problems, then we would have a better idea of what > to fix. > Thanx > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
