dene maxwell wrote:
Thanks for the input...I'll pose this question...on the same platform
but with a 6000 series card what improvement in frame rate would you
anticipate?
Dene
From: syd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: FlightGear user discussions <flightgear-users@flightgear.org>
To: FlightGear user discussions <flightgear-users@flightgear.org>
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Graphics Cards for FG
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:37:27 -0800
dene maxwell wrote:
I've seen alot of discussion on graphics cards and their suitability
for FG.
dedicated boxes seem to be the preferred way to go so I've been
looking at graphics cards as a place to start.
A couple of questions;
What's the significance of "AGP"?
Has anyone had any experience with the GF MX4000 cards?
Dene
Hi there.... Im running a AMD Athalon 1.1 gig using a GF MX4000 , and
I average about 25 to 30 fps , depending on scenery detail, in
Flightgear . I would have preferred a better card but was limited to
a budget. But it does the job .....
Syd
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
_________________________________________________________________
Read the latest Hollywood gossip @ http://xtramsn.co.nz/entertainment
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Hi again ... Im not what improvements I'd get ... but I'd sure love to
try :)
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
