Quoting dene maxwell : > Hi Fred, > IIRC, when I was using FGSD and TaxiDraw to get the "new" NZWN layout. When > I laid it onto the processed raw data, in parts it *sunk* below the terrain > because the terrain wasn't expecting (read suitably modified) to accomodate > the airport. At that stage I thought that the terrain had to be marked as > *airport* so the elevations generated by the TaxiDraw output would over-ride > the terrain elevations. > > Subsequently I have come across some-one that had trees growing in the > middle of the runway; even when the TaxiDraw output sat on the terrain ok, > but the underlying terrain was not marked as *airport* but *forest (or > whatever)* and *random objects* were enabled. > > This was quite a few months ago so I may not be up with the *current* > play...but I believe this is still the case ...yeah?
No, this is not, or you followed a wrong process ( use an old airport with a generated terrain, or vice-versa ) -Fred -- Frédéric Bouvier http://frfoto.free.fr Photo gallery - album photo http://www.fotolia.fr/p/2278 Other photo gallery http://fgsd.sourceforge.net/ FlightGear Scenery Designer ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
