On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:28 -0600, Curtis Olson wrote: > On 1/18/07, Daniel Pekelharing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Curt, > > Thanks for the reply, > I take it then that it's OK to acquire the scenery through a > commercial > OSS vendor.. > > We've taken publicly available data and processed it into FlightGear > scenery, so we don't add or remove rights to that original data. In > the case where users contribute models and buildings and landmarks, I > believe that is all done via the gpl. > > So this might be too legally vague for a commercial OSS vendor, but > there's nothing from within the FlightGear project that would prevent > someone from redistributing our scenery.
I understand... I guess that was probably the problem they had in the first place... (the "vagueness").. and as such they won't want to take any "chances".. It's worth a try though :-) - Daniel Pekelharing ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
