On Nov 29, 2007 3:29 PM, Berndt, Jon S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I tried the 182 as well and it was really difficult as well.
> > These are all out of KSFO and using 0.9.10.
> >
> > Any thoughts. This is also sort of a question on basic
> > flying techniques and things I might be doing wrong or basic
> > aerodynamic issues between the different planes.
> >
> > Thanks for a great program.
> >
> > bk
>
> Ther eis torque and P-factor that comes into play. It could be that the
> effects are overstated in the aircraft model, but they are real effects.
> We need the inputs of someone who has flown such an aircraft. In the
> past, I have received reports that the effect is properly modeled.
>
> Jon
>
I flew a 172N and 172S for about a year as a student pilot and I believe the
effect is well modeled and quite realistic.
I recall some issue with the slip/skid indicator in FlightGear, but I
haven't flown this aircraft recently.
--
Simon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
