On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 22:50 +0000, leee wrote: > IMO, a very worthwhile bit of work (but I've no way of testing or > verifying your work). I hope you get the feedback required to tune > it and make it a universal option. > > As far as I understand things, could this be part of SimGear, as > opposed to being FG specific? > > LeeE
Melchoir, looks very interesting. Almost enough to make me want to buy a web-cam. And a dual core processor. And more ram. :) Lee, It looks like he is using the generic protocol, which I believe is part of flightgear not simgear. So we are rather limited by where the IO capabilities live. Also, it appears nasal (or some other mechanism) is required to convert the head locations into values we can plug into /sim/current-view. Ron ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
