On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:44 PM, Michael Sweet wrote: >> Do you want to keep "Fl::set_awake_cb()" API? It is way better >> than the >> "Fl::wait(void*)" API, but may be confusing as a third API?! > >> Fl::wait(void *)???
Fl::awake(void*) - tsk tsk. > Let's kill Fl::set_awake_cb() and stick with the RPC approach which > is more general-purpose. Fl::awake(void *) can be documented as a > "set a flag" type of API, where losing values is not problematic. > Fl::awake(Fl_Awake_Func, void *) can be the "reliable" RPC mechanism > for threaded apps. OK, I'll write the documentation tomorrow. Too late at night now. Thanks, and sorry for dropping this on you unannounced. Bad style on my part. Matthias ---- http://robowerk.com/ _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
