Cannot agree more. I would add that changing internal structure everyday clearly shows a lack of distance and synthesis taken on the architecture, making it looking more like an unstructured amusement rather than a solid development, this is not how i consider what fltk2 should be... Really pissed off, sorry.
+1 Fabien > > a Widget* rather than a Group*. > > > > This is still a work in progress, as the basic Widget does draw or do > > anything with it's children, and several widgets such as menus are > > still subclasses of Group rather than of Widget. > > Bill, I'm going to be blunt here: MAKE A FUCKING BRANCH FOR DISRUPTIVE > CHANGES YOU AREN'T FINISHING IN A SINGLE COMMIT. It is trivial to do, > you can even use some simple shell scripts I've created for this at: > > http://www.easysw.com/~mike/svn-cheat.html > > Breaking things in trunk just pisses people off, and trunk is already > unstable enough as it is... > > Thank you! > > PS: I'm not saying that I don't welcome these changes, but I'd > welcome a complete changeover more than a partial commit that by > your own admission won't compile... > > -- > ______________________________________________________________________ > Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw dot com > Internet Printing and Publishing Software http://www.easysw.com > _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
