> Fltk-2 doesn't seem to be as actively maintained as the 1.1.x and 1.3.x > series, so a lot of things in it are well behind the curve. So if you > need latest stable, you should probably be using 1.1.9 or 1.3.x.
Ah, I assumed it was parallel current dev. Long story but I am evaluating. Some news perhaps. I am using open watcom on xp. I can report that 1.3 does compile and seems to work. watcom 1.7a which is current. Took a while to work out what was needed but in the end was easy. v2 is whole different game, needs a reworked build system. Snag is that I am neither c++ nor a make capable, I think the other way around. (ancient and more at home in deep embedded realtime, looking for a wrapper for ansi c with cross platform possibilities) Painful but I am taking a stab at getting cmake to help. As I understand it v2 is more likely to be acceptable for mainsteam users cross platform. I've never seen what this looks like, hence the attempt to get a build. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
