All, How do people feel about my "fl_text_extents" patch (STR #2076)?
I don't know how to get something new like that added to the API. This change is very useful, to me, so I'd very much like to push it into the source, but how do I get agreement for that? Is the proposed API acceptable? Does it suitably follow the fltk-style? Comments please, -- Ian SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
