Michael Sweet wrote: > imacarthur wrote: >> ... >> I guess we should try and gather opinions about a min version. I'm >> happy to drop Win9x, but am less sure about dropping NT4 at this >> stage. Anyone? > > +1 for dropping Win9x/WinMe/WinNT.
I did a few more tests with Win98 (in a VirtualBox VM), and this showed that it didn't work. The window didn't appear on the screen, but the application was running in the background (maybe in a cpu loop, but I don't know). Since I'm not keen on debugging Win98 ... +1 for dropping Win9x/WinMe +0.5 (;-) for dropping WinNT Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
