On 6 Dec 2008, at 7:15, Michael Sweet wrote: > imacarthur wrote: >> ... >> I guess we should try and gather opinions about a min version. I'm >> happy >> to drop Win9x, but am less sure about dropping NT4 at this stage. >> Anyone? > > +1 for dropping Win9x/WinMe/WinNT.
I'd be +1 on dropping Win9x/ME (mainly since they are broken now anyway in 1.3.x) WinNT4 - it still mostly works (Albrecht said), but will probably get more broken as we add more UTF8 support and so forth... Can we *say* it is dropped, so that end-users are not too surprised, but not deliberately code to break it, at least in the short term? (I'm thinking of my fl_text_extents patch here; that outright broke WinNT4, but a little extra code to check for the missing methods allows it to run on NT and still do something reasonable there.) _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
