Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > Hi, > as you can see at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364295 I'm > working on a Debian package for fltk2 (needed by dillo etc...), however I've > few questions for you: > - are ABI/API stable? > - will be important ABI/API changes? > - why SONAMEs are not built by default? > - as I can see ldconfig doesn't generate symlinks for SONAMEs using "make > install" (as usually is done), why? > > Thanks, > Devid Antonio Filoni >
Devid, thanks a lot for doing this, it is greatly appreciated. Ian and Greg already answered your questions but I have one more thing to say - if you are packaging Dillo2 as it is at the moment, the best thing you can do is to package FLTK2 at the same time (ie. to make a package like: fltk-2.0.0-6575.i386.deb and dillo2-2.0.0.i386.deb which would depend on that exact FLTK2 package. This is how i do my FLTK2 + Dillo2 RPMs (i use them on Fedora, but I know for sure they work on several other RPM-based distributions. However, as already suggested, the best would be to link Dillo2 statically against FLTK2, and it would also mean less dependencies for dillo2. It is legal as well. Kind regards _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
