Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
> Greg Ercolano wrote:
>>
>> void draw(int,int,int,int);
>> handle(int,int,int,int,int).
>>
>> Should both simply be removed?
>
> +1: if anybody finds out that they serve a specific purpose, we can easily
> get them back from svn or add them again, but then with implementation.
Removing seems the right thing to do.
If the need ever arises that we need them, it will be obvious
what to write, so keeping these prototypes doesn't seem helpful.
Here's what it looks like with the two methods commented out;
just pasting this here 'just for the record', before I remove it:
/*
xxx UNUSED METHODS -- COMMENTED OUT -- SHOULD BE DELETED
xxx Draws the contents of the browser within the specified bounding box.
xxx \todo Find the implementation, if any, and document it there!
xxxx erco: No implementation for this, comment out for now, delete later.
xxx
xxx void draw(int,int,int,int);
xxx * * *
xxx Handles the specified event, plus 4 extra parameters!
xxx \todo Find the implementation, if any, and document it there!
xxx fabien: I guess the answer is there is no implementation (yet?),
xxx so let's comment out this method that does not exist.
xxx erco: Yes, lets comment out for now, and delete later when sure.
xxx int handle(int,int,int,int,int);
*/
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
