> Greg Ercolano wrote: > > I'm not absolutely sure about it, but I would prefer a different branch for > starting the FLA upgrade. ... > > I can also see the problem if this approach takes a longer time to merge the > changes later, but I think that this would be much better because it wouldn't > block development (and release !) of FLTK 1.3.0. > > What I would do: > > Step 1: create a development branch, e.g. branch-1.3-fla > ...
I think it will be better plane it for fltk-1.4 IMHO we need to finish fltk-1.3.0 as quick as possible. the main thing of 1.3 must be UTF-8 support. I don't say that idea of FLA is bad. but we don't have fla now and need utf. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
