[..] > I looked at the ANSI C++ spec (ISO 14882), but could not find a clear > definition on this.
FWIW, I'm pretty sure there won't be anything in the standard about this. Since the size of a literal string is known at compile time, there's no reason for a compiler to allocate the string simply to satisfy the sizeof operator. That said, there's nothing to prevent a compiler from putting the string "abracadabra" or anything else it pleases into a binary. But why would it do so? It's just a quality of implementation (non-) issue. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
