>
> When reading through the new docs in preparation for the upload, I saw in
>
> http://www.fltk.org/doc-1.3/classFl__Device__Plugin.html
>
> that there is a reference to "Fl_Abstract_Printer *" that is obviously
> (and intentionally, AFAIK) not documented. But maybe it should be ?
This is fixed for the next time the doc will be generated.
(Don't do it now, because Fl_Device doc is not yet finalized)
>
> Documentation of fl_draw() etc.: Meanwhile I came to the conclusion
> that I like to see all drawing methods in the Fl_Device class
> context. Maybe it would be a good idea just to add
>
> \see Fl_Device::draw()
>
> or similar to the old (and now undocumented) fl_draw() etc. functions.
> Then we could add a back-link or note that the draw() etc. methods are
> called by the corresponding fl_draw() etc. function.
>
> What do you think about that?
>
> Albrecht
Do you mean that FLTK end users should now preferentially use, e.g;,
fl_device->draw("xxx", x, y);
instead of
fl_draw("xxx", x, y);
?
This is an interesting suggestion, but it would be a major change
to be carefully discussed.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
