On 20 Mar 2010, at 9:07, manolo gouy wrote:
>>
>> Documentation of fl_draw() etc.: Meanwhile I came to the conclusion
>> that I like to see all drawing methods in the Fl_Device class
>> context. Maybe it would be a good idea just to add
>>
>> \see Fl_Device::draw()
>>
>> or similar to the old (and now undocumented) fl_draw() etc.
>> functions.
>> Then we could add a back-link or note that the draw() etc. methods
>> are
>> called by the corresponding fl_draw() etc. function.
>>
>> What do you think about that?
>>
>> Albrecht
>
> Do you mean that FLTK end users should now preferentially use, e.g;,
> fl_device->draw("xxx", x, y);
> instead of
> fl_draw("xxx", x, y);
> ?
>
> This is an interesting suggestion, but it would be a major change
> to be carefully discussed.
I assumed that Albrecht was only referring to the docs...
I don't think I'd be all that keen on "changing" all my code.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
