Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
> Greg Ercolano wrote:
>> Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
>>> BTW: I used Fl_Help_View.cxx for my tests, because this is
>>> definitely not in the correct FLTK style.
>>>
>>> Maybe we could do a one-shot-formatting with manual cleanup?
>>> Find another tool ?
>>> Or leave it as it is ...>
>> I'd be happy to do a manual cleanup of Fl_Help_View.cxx's indents.
>> What svn branch is this, and I'll check it out, fix it, put it back.
>
> Of course, *the* branch (FLTK 1.3) - but wait a moment ...
I guess I haven't been following this thread very carefully.
I thought for sure we wouldn't be reindenting 1.3 because of the
giant diffs it would create, making tracking bugs and regressions
across the transition harder.
I thought the turning point in this thread was all files were touched
in FLTK3 (Matt's first comment on April 2 in this thread), and that
only the FLTK3 branch (I'm assuming there is one) was being changed
because so much code was modified.
Maybe all of 1.3 has already been touched and I missed it?
If 1.3 makes a giant diff, it kind of cuts the tethers to our
stable previous releases, which I think can weaken us for bug fixing..
but I guess if its been decided to "make the jump", I guess it's
good to do it, I just need to know this for my own purposes because
it affects my commercial software which is using a hotrodded 1.3.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
