On 08/12/10 10:46, Greg Ercolano wrote: > Not sure how we use this, but if it's just to allocate string buffers > in FLTK, I'm thinking we should always use the larger value. > > In other words, regardless of the OS limitations; we should handle > long pathnames correctly; let the OS fail with 'pathname too long' > if it can't handle it.
Yes - OK, I see that making sense... _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
