On 16.12.2010, at 00:19, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > On 15.12.2010 21:02, Greg Ercolano wrote: > >> Albrecht Schlosser wrote: >>>> I made the methods 'private' so that we don't change the >>>> public api. >>> >>> Hmm, maybe protected would be useful (but then we must document >>> them, too). Oh, and maybe also virtual... >> >> We could always open them up. >> I just didn't want to get into an 11th hour API design session ;) > > Agreed (however we can't make anything /virtual/ once we released > 1.3 because of ABI changes).
Thanks for bringing this up. Please let's not get hung up on API's and implementation details. FLTK 1.3 is already a huge step over 1.1. Please let's try to make it public ASAP, so we can learn from it. We should not plan on having 11 patch versions as in 1.1, but much rather have one or two bug fix releases in the 1.3 series and then move on to 1.4 (or 3.0, whichever we decide on). - Matthias _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
