DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563 Version: 1.3-feature Well, I may be missing a point, but I don't see any benefit in un-inlining these methods. I presume that we will need new (i.e. additional) methods anyway if we extend the functionality to use Fl_Image or others for the icons. So, what would we gain if we change the existing methods now? That said, we can always add new methods w/o breaking the ABI, as long as they are not virtual and/or need additional member variables. I supect that we might need other member variables if we add alpha masks (as distinct objects), or at least some more bit flags to know what kind of image/icon object we have. Thus, I believe that the existing methods that deal only with void* pointers won't change if we add other icon formats and methods. I suggest to move this STR to 1.4 (or to close it), because we can't know in advance which new functionality we will need, before we have proposals (and maybe patches) for a concrete API extension. Please explain why you think that your patch should be applied now, and what I may have overlooked. Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563 Version: 1.3-feature _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
