I described FLTK-2.0 as "experimental but dormant" in Article #825, "What are the versions of FLTK", but with Ben now plugging away at the 2.0 STR list, is there a better way to describe it.
Would "Experimental, was dormant, but maybe now waking again" be OK? Now I read it back it seems sarcastic, and that was not my intention. D. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
