> As we all know, FLTK has its own "static link exception"
> in our license file included with the toolkit ("COPYING").
>
> However, of *possible* confusion:
>
> The headers in all our source files refer to the raw LGPL
> from gnu.org, which *might* be a point of confusion,
> since IIRC *that* license would make no mention of our
> exception.
>
> Arguably our COPYING license overrides this, but perhaps our
> headers should be more clear about the static exception.
Yes - I have wondered about this in the past, too. I'd guess I would
like it to call up the fltk-modified LGPL explicitly, just to be safe,
but IANAL...
Mike is usually quite good on this sort of stuff, I wonder what he
thinks? It may be the way it is at present because of some specific
thing that I don't understand!
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
