We should drop the reference to gnu.org and just refer to it as the FLTK
License...
On Jul 14, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> As we all know, FLTK has its own "static link exception"
> in our license file included with the toolkit ("COPYING").
>
> However, of *possible* confusion:
>
> The headers in all our source files refer to the raw LGPL
> from gnu.org, which *might* be a point of confusion,
> since IIRC *that* license would make no mention of our
> exception.
>
> Arguably our COPYING license overrides this, but perhaps our
> headers should be more clear about the static exception.
> _______________________________________________
> fltk-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
