On 07/19/11 05:52, Greg Ercolano wrote:
>>
>>>> Great, I've made STR#2685 and assigning it to myself.
>>>
>>> Big thank you for volunteering for such a big task. One question
>>> though: are we (you) going to do this for 1.3, 3.0, or both? ;-)
>>
>> I guess both in the longer term, but we do 1.3 first... and it appears
>> Greg would agree, as he's taken a big chunk out of the 1.3 ones already!
>
> Right -- I think I got em all in 1.3.
[ah, disregard last post. Was using the web form instead of my
usual newsreader, and of course I typed a tab+space which posted
the text while I was editing.. meh. Probably a big cause of the
multiple posts we see from new users]
For anyone doing this in the future, some breadcrumbs:
I think my favorite 'do everything' command was something like:
vi `grep -r //.This.library.is.free . | grep -v /\.svn/ | grep -v Binary | cut
-d: -f1 | uniq`
..and using a repeat (.) of a "c14j" command to change the 14 lines
of the license header to the new text, and a keyboard macro for
:w and :n. So pretty much it was hitting two keys to edit each file,
and adjusting the macro a bit when files differed.
The rest is just eye-balling to make sure the edit looks right,
(since license formats and commenting styles differed a bit).
Then ran a 'grep -r WARRANTY' (the text I removed) to make sure there
weren't any un-edited stragglers.
The different comment styles I encountered were '#', '*', //, "dnl"
(Makefiles, C files, C++ files, and doxygen or something for "dnl")
There were a few others.
Did a little at a time, then did something else, then did a little
more. Then did a few 'svn diff' checks to make sure things looked
right.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
