> I have put the functions in Fl_Menu_Item namespace only because maming > them > that way seems to make sense. As far as I know, static functions (and > static class variables) do not break ABI: they are not "really" class > members, just additional ordinary functions and global variables with > fancy naming sugar (functions with class namespace scope). For that > matter > even addition of a non-virtual class function should not break ABI > either - > any compiler guru can confirm this or am I wrong?
I'm in favour of this change, if we are happy it's not ABI breaking. I'm not even sure, but Roman's discussion sounds right! Selex ES Ltd Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
