Millan wrote:
> I omitted them because even with them result is the same.
> The following:
>
> begin();
> win = new Window(100, 100);
> win->begin();
> win->end();
>
> menu = new PopupMenu(0, 0, w, h);
> menu->type(PopupMenu::POPUP3);
> menu->begin();
> about_item = new Item("About clock");
> exit_item = new Item("Exit clock");
>
> menu->end();
> menu->callback(cb_menu, this);
> end();
I think you'll find if you re-arrange the code so that
one window is not defined inside the other, it will work.
(Because the second window is really a separate window)
eg:
// First window
begin();
// menu a child of first window
menu = new PopupMenu(0, 0, w, h);
menu->type(PopupMenu::POPUP3);
menu->begin();
about_item = new Item("About clock");
exit_item = new Item("Exit clock");
menu->end();
menu->callback(cb_menu, this);
end();
color(12);
show();
// Second window
win = new Window(100, 100);
win->begin();
// put widgets in second window here
win->end();
win->show();
That puts the menu on the first window.
If you want it in the second window, just move the menu code
between the win->begin() and win->end().
From what I can tell, since the windows are separate, it doesn't
(seem) to make sense to define one inside the definition of the
other. I think what was happening in your case is the definition
of the second window implied end()ing the first. I think.
Maybe the developers can weigh in on this one; I'm not too
familiar with fltk 2.0 to know if that's how it's supposed to work.
But I think re-arranging the code so that the windows are defined
separately makes sense, as they really are separate.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
